Category Archives: Political life

The new Mithraism

Given his comment in my last posting, I think Bill Barr and I might be talking past each other.

I think that if there is renewed spying and surveillance (different things) on peace activists, the driving force is political, not from the career military. Also, the past to which I refer is the early 70s, not the 80s. (Which were hardly blameless, but not within the scope of my current concern.)

But there is a political use of the military that ties in here, for which the military benefits in its appropriations and recruitment goals, and which we Americans need to be careful of: fetishizing the military. Today, political opportunists use it to quell dissent. Something along the lines of “if you speak against the American presence in Iraq, you’re hurting the troops.” Quakers, al-Qaeda — all the same.

Which means sooner or later people are going to have to say something about the military that’ll offend someone, if for no other reason than it is so easy to be accused of causing offense.

Warning: sharp segue.

Since Christmas is coming, I can’t help but think of Mithraism: one of Christianity’s main competetors in the ancient world, and there are some (opinions differ to the extent) cultic and social overlaps. The December 25 date is probably a direct rip-off from the Mithraists, given their Mithra was born that day. It was very popular among soldiers, and a plague among them is credited for Mithraism’s decline.

Had things gone differently, can you image what the greeting cards would look like this time of the year?

Mithras fresco, public domain at Wikipedia

There’s an interesting desciption of the social power of Mithraism in its article at Wikipedia:

At Rome, the third century emperors encouraged Mithraism, because of the support which it afforded to the divine nature of monarchs. Mithras thus became the giver of authority and victory to the Imperial House.

No comment.

Today, of course, matters are different. Instead of a soldier’s religion, we have a civil religion about soldiers. Consider that, but hold it to one side.

For me, the worse matter is how lauded and defended “the troops” are on one hand, and how badly treated they are in real life. When soldiers can get food stamps but not armor plating, we have a big problem. Don’t get me started about military pensions or medical care.

The government — under either party — has long seen fit to make promises to the military that haven’t been kept. I’ve written about this before, and shall again.

But the result is the same: when the troops — and our ideas of what proper concerning the military — are misused we can’t be silent.

He’s makin’ a list

Well, the one good thing I can say about the current Administration is that’s there’s always something awful happening; that way you keep busy and don’t get obsessed by Christmas too early. Grrr.

Back in seminary (and before), there was a one-line faith self-assessment of the “What would Jesus do?” ilk. It went, If Christianity became a crime, would there be enough evidence to convict you?

Well, now that the Pentagon has likely gone all nostalgic and started collecting information about anti-war protesters, we might get to see this question become literally true. Sunny “it couldn’t happen here” feelings don’t hold a lot of water for me any more.

I think everyone in the land needs to do something brave, peaceful, and life-affirming: something list-worthy. Right now, we seem a nation of cowed and fearful people, which doesn’t excuse us from being judged for our inaction.

Lord I hope the “unrighteous nation deserves God’s wrath” crowd are wrong or there’ll be flaming blood meteors over Washington by New Year’s Day.

Hat tip: Jess’s Journal

Let’s hear it for courage

Years ago, back in Georgia, I was cutting up with the other “support staff” for a wedding I was officiating. All of us — the bed-and-breakfast (site) owners, the caterers, the pianist, the soloist, and I — were gay men or lesbians. All, of course, but the couple. And this was long before Massachusetts began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. We joked — but only joked — that we could shut down the local wedding biz.

There’s something to be said about using the strength you have, and at the very least not being co-opted into forces that hurt you. Take the current Administration’s “keep the people distracted by fear” gambit, which I’m glad to say seems to be getting threadbare. I don’t buy it, and live better without it. Be not afraid.

That’s how I’m reading the firing and sympathy resignation of a cantor and organist in a Massachusetts Catholic parish. Philocrites wrote about it, follow a story in the Globe. Good for them, and I suspect they’ll land on their feet which is more than I suspect will happen to the parish’s music program.

How could you sing the Lord’s song in a strange land? And Boston Catholicism — by all accounts — is getting stranger by the second.

Who’s the delusional one?

The BBC is hammering away at the situation of New Orleanians where the dead aren’t being gathered and where some continue to stay in their flooded homes; one reporter called the city “delusional.”

Perhaps, perhaps not. While I don’t think I would resist armed troops trying to extricate me, I can see

  • how some people might value their pets more than their government’s promises.
  • how some people might think a city of the dead might be safer than relocation to parts unknown.

Another Wells says it for me

For the last two days, I’ve been relying more and more on the BBC for my coverage of the Gulf Coast disaster because it has a bit of distance in its reportage, feels no need to pad its stories with emotionally manipulative themes, and (thus?) seems less likely to induge in rumor-mongering. Not that British journalists shy away from making a point.

I just read an editorial from a BBC reporter out of Los Angeles, Matt Wells (no relation), that just about sums it up for me. It opens:

The only difference between the chaos of New Orleans and a Third World disaster operation, he said, was that a foreign dictator would have responded better.

New Orleans crisis shames Americans

Car-free in NOLA? and more

I’ve been thinking a lot about the people of New Orleans, southern Louisiana, and southern Mississippi, and especially about those who didn’t have the means to escape Katrina.

Seems to me that either there wasn’t the capacity (or the means to notify those in need) to use available buses to the transport car-free New Orleans and Jefferson Parish residents to other parts of the state. I looked: the plans are on paper. But the misery of Superbowl “last resort” shelter — now holding thirty thousand people — seems to have been the solution, and that’s not acceptable.

I have thought about this in my own life, seeing as some kind of unnatural disaster might afflict Washington, and Hubby and I have no car. Perhaps it would do no good anyway.

It gives one pause, and makes me think. Natural and other disasters — perhaps not so horrible as a killer hurricane — afflict most places. It makes sense to think of a non-automotive way to escape ahead of time. (Here in Washington, I’m thinking of a bus as far north as one can go, and then cut over to the C&O Canal footpath, then walking to Clara Barton’s house at Glen Echo, Maryland. The Universalist — or disaster care — tie-in is purely coincidental.)

It also makes sense to plan for alternatives to car travel in daily life, especially in the coming weeks. I suspect record-high gasoline prices are coming.

Lastly, some of Katrina’s hidden victims will freeze this winter. Higher heating oil and natural gas prices will force life-threatening heating decisions, most far from the Gulf Coast. And that’s a looming disaster that we can do something to prevent.

Swiftboating us with Iraq

I think Terrance is right: the anti-Bush forces will be tarred with whatever failures or undesirable outcomes because we didn’t support the war, and didn’t “support the troops.” How the Left undercut “the troops” is a part of the folk-wisdom of the United States; somehow this was a greater evil than, say, the carpet-bombing of Cambodia. Go figure. Just remember that facts themselves don’t constitute a debate or a defense.

But the really galling part is how hostile the current Administration is against the very troops they profess to need and defend.

If the Adminstration is unwilling to fulfill its just obligations for the veterans we have as to their health needs and benefits, then the Administration is hurting the troops today.

If the Administration leaves some low-ranking troops so underpaid that their families need food aid or other public aid, then the Administration is hurting the troops today.

As a member of the anti-war Left, I care precisely because I grew up in a military family and know that the federal government will try to make economies with those who risked everything for our nation. I know I’m not the only blogger with this background.

Before we get tarred with unpatriotism, those who care for justice, fair and transparent government, peaceful international relations, the strategic alternatives to terrorist sympathies, and the rights of those who serve need to make it loudly and publically clear that we really do support the troops with more than cheap slogans.

WWJA?

PeaceBang, after a fashion, makes me think in that oh-so-90s-way, “Who would Jesus assassinate?” Imagine the merchandise, down to the blood-red silicone wristbands.

No, wait, that can’t be right. He saith:

Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it! How often have I desired to gather your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you were not willing! (Luke 13: 34)

(Which begs another t-shirt/wristband/baseball cap slogan: “Jesus is chicken” or better yet for World Communion Sunday, “Jesus tastes like chicken” and I dare any public preacher to use that title!)

All of which is a humorous introduction to a certain reality: could Pat Robertson make Christians look any worse? I would like to slap the baptism right off of him, but failing that would like to join the throng is saying Christians don’t do assassination. Not that some haven’t, but they were wrong to do it. A pastor should know better, but perhaps he’s showing the world who his true master is.