Category Archives: Political life

Where the God of wrath?

Finished George Lakoff’s Don’t Think of an Elephant and have already passed it off (I’ll buy more copies for friends) and have ordered his Moral Politics.

His big point is that conservatives and progresives have, respectively, dominant Strong Father and Nurturant Parent worldviews, which apply to the nation which fills the role of family. I’m not fully sold on the theory, but it works in the breach.

Lakoff takes the reasonable step to distinguish between conservative and progressive religions by how they see God, again, as Strong Father or Nurturant Parent. The “Strong Father” God is the wrathful punisher, and so forth.

Today, in the mail, I got a mass-mailed booklet entitled The Path to Peace: Finding Hope in a Troubled World. It is Seventh Day Adventist, is in a magazine format, and nice if a bit folksy (in a Readers’ Digest and SDA way.) Something my grandmothers would or would have liked.

Also in typical SDA way, there’s the line:

Though all thse evidences have been given, the enemy of good blinded the minds of men, so that they looked upon God with fear; they thought of Him as severe and unforgiving. Satan led men to conceive of God as a being whose chief attribute is stern justice –one who is a severe judge, a harsh, exacting creditor.

The lesson? Find a friend where you can, and not get suckered into a culture war which, given the de facto terms of engagement, the Right would almost certainly win.

A little tonic

At Day Job, there’s a lot of talk about how apathetic the American people have gotten. Here’s my bit for being a part of the solution rather than being a part of the problem.

In long hand with blue fountain-pen ink on a small piece of writing paper:

July 13, 2005

The Hon. George W. Bush
White House
Washington, D.C.

Dear Mr. President,

As an American, I am deeply dissapointed that your advisor Mr. Rove would leak the identity of a CIA agent (even if he didn’t use her name exactly.) You said such a person in your adminstration would be fired, and I think you are honor-bound to dismiss Mr. Rove from your service.

Yours truly,
(The Rev.) Scott Wells

[my address]

It took me a few minutes and was a lot more satisfying that talking about Scott McClellan flop sweat.

And it wouldn’t be hard would it be for ten of my US readers to do likewise. Write a letter.

Here’s the address:

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Red Ken’s letter is a good example for younger ministers

At age thirty-six, perhaps there are others better equipped to offer advice to younger ministers, but they don’t blog.

Right now, read and bookmark the Mayor of London Ken Livingstone’s remarks following yesterday’s bombings. I’ve long liked him for having a keen interest in city transport, for his role local government, and for putting the screws to Thatcher when few would; Red Ken — I rather like the nickname even though it was coined perjoritively — is the kind of politician I wish we had a few of.

His words are stirring, but the reason you should read and bookmark them is because they are a good example of the kind of emergency letter or speech most minister will need to give at least once in their careers. Firm, caring, directive, and hopeful. With a recognizable structure, which is an aid to writing and listening when the stress is high. Just barely long enough to get the message out without being tedious.

Livingstone was being a good leader here, and good leaders need good models.

Hattip: Philocrites and others.

Code Green forever

Well, imagine that. The local TV news reported that the GAO said some monuments are “at risk of a terrorist attack.” Who wudda thunk?

Seeing as we’ve been fed terrorism studies like a Strasbourg goose gets its lunch, I realized I’d gotten the message and resented the idea that we’re supposed to internalize it. I’m not saying there’s no global conflict, but excuse me if I absent myself from the predictable repetition of half-facts.

I really wasn’t watching the news; it was in the background. Even so, something in me snapped and I turned off the set. Since we’re perpetually at Code Orange in Washington, where’s the news?

I’m giving myself a holiday, or perhaps more aptly, a reassignment. I will listen to terrorism news when there’s substantive commentary that is able to produce a thoughtful response, and will turn off everything else.

My sanity and mind — perhaps my soul, and perhaps yours too — demands nothing less.

Showing up where it counts

I wasn’t going to say anything but Sean Parker (Ministrare) asked first about the merit of the virtual march against global warming.

As a Washingtonian, I’m usually glad when people stay home and keep the subways clear of gawkers. But this is kinda silly and I can’t imagine anyone with pull in this Administration is going to think anything of it. (Perhaps the endorsement/participation of the governor of California will help. Or not.) In 2010, I suspect those who “marched” will be saying, “Oh, we were so hopeful then! I emailed! But what was I thinking!” Of course, by then, I suspect we’ll all be barcode-tatooed and mining coal by hand in a Republic of Gideon Patriot Freedom Re-education Center.

I’m none too impressed when Bill Sinkford manufactures news, but I would have been quite happy if he had been in My Fair City a couple of days ago to participate in a joint action that would have make more of a difference:

Interfaith Leaders Work to End Hunger

(Was he invited?)

The Amnesty report and administration response

I was having an ordinary conversation about a federally-mandated program related to the work of Day Job with another Day Job Employee when our respective frustration about the President, the Vice President and their responses to the Amnesty International report led us to a shared catharsis. Who do they think they are? And do they think we Americans are that stupid? was the thrust of it. In a couple of moments we simmered down and got back to business, but the immediacy of the response startled me.

I felt as if the American people have been under a nuclear — make that “nookaler” — winter cloud of self-restraint since 9/11. The kind of cloud that makes compassionate people forget themselves in a wave of self-consuming, destructive fear. Tie that to the baseball bat of Bush moralism, and its easy to see how one wouldn’t want to speak up. After all, it isn’t a long road from those “who hate America” — the President’s catch-all justification for a lawless incarceration at Guantanamo; he makes Castro look like a champion of justice in contrast — to those who defend the most basic of their human rights. We’re supposed to take as given that the detainees are as bad as they say, but who can trust the Bush administration to be anything other than self-serving. Add the volleys of attacks from the right and it is easy for anyone less-right to be caught off balance.

Let Cheney be insulted or Bush grieved. They’re liars and violent men. They’ve degrade the trust the people have in the office. They need to be called out and condemned before they do more damage to this country, its most vulnerable, and those it can victimize in silence and in shadows. They make us liars and violent by proxy, and hateful in millions of eyes.

Guantánamo Bay – a human rights scandal

First Amendment reality check

Remember this name: Cale J. Bradford.

He’s the Indiana judge — I am so fumin’ freakin’ mad right now I can barely type — who barred a pair of divorced parents from teaching their son Wiccan religion. You’ll see this story linked all over the blogosphere

In one of those “throw me a bone” moments, I kept looking for some mitigating circumstance like a nasty divorce, an informal arrangement, and a misunderstanding that got out of control. Don’t believe it.

Spare a prayer for Tom Jones, Jr. and Tammie U. Bristol and their son, whose fundamental rights are being steamrolled.

I can’t imagine this ruling will hold, and I hope the Indiana supreme court feeds Bradford to the wolves.

Hat tip to Jason at WildHunt.org and ChaliceChick (and not a certain A-list blogger) for the tip.

The partisan parson

By this time, I’m sure you’ve heard about the pastor of the East Waynesville (North Carolina) Baptist church who expelled (excommunicated strikes me as the wrong word with Baptists) some members for their non-support of and non-voting for George W. Bush. Charles Currie is one of the earlier one to have blogged the story, which is being carried by the AP and highlighted at the Daily Kos.

There’s a lot of meat here, and a lot to object to. It also begs some questions.

  1. What are the power structures at this church that would allow the pastor to do this?
  2. If and when this churches loses its tax-exempt status, will the support sour?
  3. How large was the church to expell nine and have forty more leave in protest? Was this a significant proportion?
  4. Are we all fools propelling a publicity engine?

My gut guess is that the brouhaha will pass, and the deacons will pass the pastor off the scene. They are Baptists after all, and someone won’t take kindly to this action and embarassment.

Parliament returns coverage

No other blogging tonight — fascinated by the UK parliamentary election returns. Interesting to see another, more candid political culture. Fun to see the very marginal candidates stand and hear they got double-digit votes. Happy to see successful (or at least hear “swing to the”) Liberal Democrats. Nice to have returns while the sun is still shining!

On CSPAN2 tonight.

Taxing time

Well, I decided to hold off blogging today until I was done with, if not my tax forms, then my estimations and extensions.

I normally look upon tax paying as a civic duty, but with the war in Iraq overseas, the administration’s war on gay families at home (I flinched at the “single” box on the tax forms), and the lack of any meaningful Federal representation from the District of Columbia — well, it was a bit more than unmitigated joy tonight.